Related Articles:
SUSANNAH
It really becomes wild when you read SSOA and Sitchin at the same time. For me, it is very important to try and clear up the discrepencies. If I am to embrace the SSOA material and I really do want to, then there is a lot that I have to believe "on faith" just like a regular everyday religion and I don't like that.
There is an "Anu" in the Sumerian tales- and his consort An. They were the Primary Gods and the Annunaki were their namesakes. Mila calls them Ananuki. And you're right, Enlil and Enki were major figures as they were the firstborn sons of Anu. Birth order was everything to these people- it set up the entire basis for kingship which they brought to Earth. The whole idea of inter-marrying to keep the bloodlines pure and that sort of thing. "Blueblooded".
The Sumarian accounts have them also living for thousands of years as a normal condition. I can't remember if Sitchin gets into life-extension practices, which is a key concept for SSOA- but definitely both agree on the purpose of the seeding of humanity. They created us in test tubes to be slaves. Sitchin has no mention of other races that I can recall beating the Anu to the punch as to landing on Earth (the other Red Root races). So that's a niggling issue for me. I'm going to have to go back and double check on that one of these days.
Yes, I do believe that Zeus is aka Anu. Hera is An, and so on. He lays it all out in one of the books. Innana was Aphrodite, Athena, they're all there. He also has some amazing research into the Hindu-Indian "gods". They were offshoots and sons-princes of Anu. He sent his sons and daughters to rule in different geographical locations across the globe to rule. That's why all of the major world religions have so many similarities! Joseph Conrad has written some fascinating stuff on myth and it's importance to human evolution. I have come to believe that there is more truth to the myth than our current historians are willing to embrace. They would probably be tarred and feathered for even mentioning such concepts. Relegated to being outcasts, UFO nuts- tin foil conspiracy theorists- the way that the intellectual elite likes to label anyone with views outside the conventional wisdom of the day.
Mr. Sitchin's historical research unraveling the South American ancient histories and how they relate to the Annunaki is also simply mind boggling. He is so incredibly detailed as he interprets the tablets and the archaeological evidence at the same time. Why did the indigenous peoples of the Earth value gold so much? Answer: they really didn't. The Incas didn't use it as trading commerce, they kept it stored and used it in their temples. It was reserved for the "Gods". Other than that, they didn't drool over it nearly as much as say...the Spanish conquerors. Where did they learn those habits? All over the globe, gold has always held an important significance, but how or why did that one specific element come to be held in such high esteem by the Earth's worker people? The evidence for massive mining is also in the archeological record both in Africa and South America. I'm rambling...
Anyway, just like the SSOA, Sitchin believes that the "gods" from the greek "myths" and Roman and Egyptian gods were real people in history, some with god-like abilities depending on their ancestry. Some of them were half "god" or Anu and half human. Apparently the in-breeding angered Anu back on Nibiru (Mila says they come from the Pleiades) he yelled at Enlil, and that's what brought about the great flood. He does a great job of connecting the characters in the Judeo-Torah-bible with the Sumarian characters.
It's easy to see where the Torah gets it's stories from. Personally after reading so much Sitchin, it becomes abundantly clear that the Bible "myths" were mostly also true stories that actually happened. Modern day biblical archeology has proven that many of the places were real. Of course where modern day religionists and I part ways is in our explanation for who "God" is.
The Egypt-Anu-Bible connection has also been cleared up by Sitchin, but Mila gets really different when it comes to the Egyptian role. For example the Pharoh Islands, the purpose of the pyramids (Sitchin says they're landmarks for piloting rocketships).
Many in the ascending community believe that the Great Pyramid was an initiation temple of some kind. It's all very confusing, and yet fascinating for me to spend time trying to unravel all the stories and versions and to try and make sense of it all.
The main glaring differences are the time tables that each refers to.
If it weren't for Mila's millions of years format, then they would be more compatible. But when the versions are so different, it makes me doubt the validity of some of her channelings. Maybe it's just her interpretation of time.who knows.
That, and the glaring difference of Sitchin's belief in Nibiru, he spends a ton of time mapping out it's orbit, showing how it is historically referred to by the Sumarians and Egyptians etc. And Mila's insistence that the Anu were from a completely different star system. That's hard for me.