Recommended Articles or Essays:
INTRODUCTION
Whatever you think of the videos on the Desteni site, they are sure thought-provoking. This page deals with another one of Veno's concepts, namely the idea of 'liquified systems' that pass through the navel string from the mother to the baby in the womb, determining its subconscious mind. How does this compare to the idea of the lineages that is part of the SSOA-philosophy?
BLOOD TRANSFUSION
In the second and third 'structural resonance' video by Veno we get introduced to an interesting idea about the development of the baby in the womb. You'd better take a look yourself, but as far as I have come to understand it, the following would take place during sexual intercourse and during the conception of a baby.
You know about the 'mind consciousness systems' that Veno (and other Desteni guests) often use (see for instance Hit the Mind Once Again) to describe the collection of distorted thought-forms that would make up much of every human being. During sexual intercourse both these 'mind-systems' would integrate into both future parents. This way the future mother would take over the mind-system of her future husband (or friend) and vica versa.
Somehow this newly integrated mind system would enter the body of the mother. When a fetus is conceived the mother would feed these mind systems of both her and her husband to this baby. Veno talks about the liquefaction of these mind systems into the bloodstream leading to the baby. In this fashion the newborn baby would already be 'mechanized' in a way that she or he has many of the thought-habits of her or his parents. Veno prefers to use the term 'subconscious mind' to describe the field that would be mainly formed through this intra-womb blood (or system-) transfusion process.
Although it is not a very nice picture, it could be true. But before I start a comparison with the SSOA-perspective there are a few odd aspects about this blood transfusion theory. If this theory is right then it would imply that everytime someone has sex with someone else there is a sharing of 'systems'. What about all those people who have had sex with more than one person in their lives? Would they have the systems of all these people running through their blood? Is there perhaps a half-time of a system, meaning that the system of someone else gradually fades after a few months? If it is possible to fuse mind-systems so easily during sex, why all the trouble in liquifying mind-systems into bloodstreams? This same mind-fusion process could be activated during the growth of the baby in the womb, or after she or he is born.
And what about those babies that are born from artificial insemination: in those cases there is no sexual intercourse between the mother and the father, would in those cases the mind-system of the non-biological father be transferred? And what about the effects of those donating blood? Wouldn't they transfer parts of liquified mind-systems?
GENETIC LINEAGES
Another perspective on the way a baby is formed during the process in the womb is from the SSOA. You can read more primary material on this by clicking here. In this theory a baby would choose 25 lineages to form its body from. These lineages are linked to the parents of the baby and all of their ancestors, which could go back hundreds and hundreds of millenia, all the way back to the creation of human beings on Earth some 300,000 years ago, within this framework. Not only would the biology of a person be built on the information of these lineages (the lungs from lineage A, the heart from lineage B, the testicles from lineage C etc.) but the mere presence of these genetics within the body would make for a connection with the thought-forms and habits of these ancestors.
You would have all kinds of lineages, some are called 'Anu-lineages', or 'Anu-slave lineages', but you would have all kinds of other lineages as well, dating back to pre-Anu times. If you have a lot of Anu or Anuslave lineages in your system you would be inclined to value the typical anu-things like possessions, power and competition. Within the ascension paradigm it would be possible to actually change the characteristics of your genetics by practising forgiveness, or by trying to alter the old Anu-habits of thinking which is an approach I prefer (see Mapcarving Anu).
Anyway, nothing here about blood transfusion. There is some mention however of the idea that when people have sex together there can be an interchange of their fields, leading to the exchange of information, power, chi etc. This however could be recovered by becoming aware of it and by creating the right intentions to fix this. If you are interested in this sexually driven information exchange see Sexuality.
CONCLUSION
Everybody is free to opt for the description that they like, but for now I see no reason to shift from the genetic lineages perspective of the SSOA to the blood transfusion concept of Veno. I prefer to see the transference of distorted thought-form as a genetic process and not as some blood transfusion process, resulting from the blending of 'mind systems' during sexual intercourse and the consequent liquefaction process of these mind systems into the blood stream. There are too many
loose ends in this theory. As for the subconscious effect: I don't think that it is only the parental mind-melting during sex that makes up the subconscious of anyone. There must be more creating the subconscious mind than only the mind-melting process.
Another reason why I dislike Veno's blood transfusion theory is that is rather negative. As if only these 'bad and distorted' mind systems can melt between the parents. I think there are many thought-forms within human beings that aren't all that bad. Rather harmless thoughts and attitudes that could be shared during sexual intercourse as well. The genetic perspective offers the opportunity to take both the harmful and the harmless aspects of someone's ancestry with the goal to learn from the mistakes of the ancestors. In Veno's perspective there seems to be only bad news, only distorted systems beings shared and handed over to the next generation with only one purpose: to stop people from realizing who they are. I think there is more to the story than just that.
Gibbon,
September 2007